
Logan Couture #487 2009 Upper Deck Hockey — Card Value
2009 Upper Deck HockeyWhat the Logan Couture #487 (2009 Upper Deck Hockey) card is worth — ungraded vs graded.
Logan Couture #487 2009 Upper Deck Hockey value — Ungraded $10 · Grade 9 $20 · PSA 10 $99. Prices updated July 2026.
Real sold prices per grade — the PSA 10 premium on this card is 9.9× raw.
Live on eBay right now
Which version do you have?
To simply own the Logan Couture #487, buy the Standard version for $10. The UD Exclusives and High Gloss versions offer minor perceived value through different printing or packaging, but the difference is minimal. If budget is the priority, stick to the Standard. Collectors seeking a slight premium or specific aesthetic should consider the UD Exclusives, but for basic ownership, the Standard is the most economical choice.
▍
Price data verified against · 1
Item details
- Brand
- Hockey
- Set
- 2009 Upper Deck Hockey
- Sport
- Hockey
- Number
- #487
Logan Couture #487 2009 Upper Deck Hockey value
A raw (ungraded) Logan Couture #487 runs around $10, a Grade 9 about $20, and a PSA 10 commands $99.
What drives the price
Grade, centering, rookie/star status, set scarcity, and print run drive sports-card value. PSA/BGS gem-mint copies and rookies of stars carry the biggest premiums; raw commons sell for little.
Price guide
Sold values by grade vs. what sellers ask today
| Condition | Value | Based on |
|---|---|---|
| Ungraded | $10 | eBay sold comps |
| Grade 9 | $20 | eBay sold comps |
| PSA 10 | $99 | eBay sold comps |
Frequently asked questions
- What is the starting resale value for an ungraded Logan Couture #487?
- An ungraded copy of the Logan Couture #487 from the 2009 Upper Deck set is currently valued around $10.
- How much is a PSA 10 version of this card worth?
- A PSA 10 graded version of the Logan Couture #487 sells for approximately $99.
- Is the condition of the card the biggest factor in its price?
- Yes, the condition significantly impacts the price; the difference between ungraded ($10) and PSA 10 ($99) shows this clearly.