Vraska, Betrayal's Sting (Phyrexia: All Will Be One) — MTG Card Value
Phyrexia: All Will Be OneWhat the Vraska, Betrayal's Sting from Phyrexia: All Will Be One is worth — market price for the single.
Vraska, Betrayal's Sting (Phyrexia: All Will Be One) value — Foil ₩50,919 · $36.08. Prices updated 2026년 8월.
Converted from USD at the ECB reference rate — sold comps are US-market sales.
Live on eBay right now
Which version do you have?
For the absolute cheapest way to own Vraska, Betrayal's Sting, grab the Standard version at $3. The higher-priced Standard versions ($35, $22, $16) offer minimal tangible differences in playability but represent different printings or potentially slightly higher demand among collectors. If you just want to play, the $3 or $6 options suffice. Pay up only if you are specifically chasing a particular edition or want the highest perceived value.
▍
가격 데이터 검증 출처 · 1
- Scryfall — Vraska, Betrayal's Sting (Phyrexia: All Will Be One)₩50,919 · $36.08
Item details
- Brand
- Mythic
- Set
- Phyrexia: All Will Be One
- Rarity
- Mythic
- Number
- #442
Vraska, Betrayal's Sting (Phyrexia: All Will Be One) value
The Vraska, Betrayal's Sting from Phyrexia: All Will Be One (#442) has a market price of $36.08.
What drives the price
For Magic singles, set, rarity, condition (NM vs played), and playability/format demand drive value. First printings, foils, and cards that see competitive or Commander play hold value best; reprints soften prices.
Price guide
What this actually trades for — sold values by condition vs. what sellers are asking today
| Condition | Value | Based on |
|---|---|---|
| Foil | ₩50,919 · $36.08 | eBay sold comps |
자주 묻는 질문
- What is the rarity of Vraska, Betrayal's Sting?
- Vraska, Betrayal's Sting is a Mythic rarity card from the set Phyrexia: All Will Be One.
- How much is a foil copy currently listed for?
- A foil copy of Vraska, Betrayal's Sting is listed for $33.79.
- Which set does this card belong to?
- This card is from the set Phyrexia: All Will Be One, and its card number is #442.
